Tom Bearden | Weather Modification - Energy Weapons - Welcome to 1985! (Video) 1hr

Friends, please keep in mind this presentation was given in 1985. Over 26 years ago... Drink that in!

Weather Modification, Molecular Manipulation & Transfer (Beam me up Scotty), Energy Weapons and a few other things. He also explains how these things work and how they look. The foundations of scalar electro-magnetics are also well explained in this presentation.

Please keep in mind (i'm guilty of this as well at times) when you watch videos or hear people speak of the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) that is here in the U.S., these people may or may not realize there are capable weather mod facility's all over the world in several countries and any one of them could strike any place in the world at will. Almost always they are just saying HAARP because it's easier. They are not stating the U.S. is responsible for all if any weather modification.

Moreover you shouldn't ever question if weather modification is possible. It is possible. That's a well documented fact folks. There are quite a few documentary's on it and have even been broadcasted on the Discovery Channel etc... It's only a matter of are they doing it or not, if so why and what country or organization.

The beginning is a bit technical but bare with it because afterward I assure you he will grab your undivided attention. This presentation was likely at McDonnell Douglas Aircraft, as Tom Bearden refers to Jack Houck, who used to work for them. If what Bearden says is true, then how has the technology advanced since 1985?

Can we imagine that any of this technology may relate to the Hutchison Effect and what was used on 9/11 to destroy the WTC? (You draw your own conclusions....)

Since 1985, the technology has been developed into more rigorous longitudinal EM wave interferometry, which is the exact nature of those earlier weather engineering weapons.

Mr Bearden explains exactly what was meant when Secretary of Defense William Cohen cryptically warned: "Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism where by they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves... So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations...It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our counter terrorism efforts."

Full DVD available here: http://www.cheniere.org/video/sovietweathervideo.html

Source: http://www.youtube.com/user/greggdurham

Lt Col Tom Bearden | The Disclosure Project Witness Testimonies (Video) 37min

Lt Col Tom Bearden on Free Energy and Anti-gravity Technology Suppression. This video cuts off at the end. ;(

Source: http://www.youtube.com/user/greggdurham

Nassim Haramein - The Schwarzschild Proton Red Ice Radio 69min

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2011/01/RIR-110106.php



January 6, 2011Nassim has spent most of his life researching the fundamental geometry of hyperspace, studying a variety of fields from theoretical physics, cosmology, quantum mechanics, biology and chemistry to anthropology and ancient civilizations. He discovered a specific geometric array that he found to be fundamental to creation, and the foundation for his Unified Field Theory emerged. His most recent paper The Schwarzschild Proton, lays down the foundation of what could be a fundamental change in our current understandings of physics and consciousness. Mr. Haramein has directed research teams of physicists, electrical engineers, mathematicians and other scientists. He has founded a non-profit organization, the Resonance Project Foundation, where, as the Director of Research, he continues exploring unification principles and their implications in our world today. Nassim joins us to discuss his paper on the Schwarzshild Proton. Topics discussed: the Holofractographic universe, infinity, the field, vaccum fluctuation, energy, quantum theory, Large Hadron Collider, Higgs Boson, quark, plasma fluid, the strong force, black holes, Casimir effect, holographic model, dark matter/dark energy, Fleischmann-Pons fusion and more.

Michael Schratt Interview 57min Video

  

Project Camelot: I interviewed Michael Schratt, an aerospace historian regarding top secret craft that he has investigated and documented. As a top notch researcher, he has met with and interviewed many NASA and defense department individuals regarding these classified projects as well as civilians. This impromtu interview reveals important evidence and as well as anecdotes that will fascinate even those who are not wild over cool planes and unidentified craft in our skies today. --Kerry Cassidy, Project Camelot
http://projectcamelotproductions.com

Breakthrough: Antimatter Trapped for the First Time

Michio Kaku on November 19, 2010, 1:13 PM

Scientists at CERN laboratory in Switzerland scored a major breakthrough recently when they trapped atoms of anti-matter for the first time in history. Fans of Star Trek know the potential implications of this achievement, since the Starship Enterprise uses matter/anti-matter annihilation to drive its engines. Maybe one day, we might be able to use anti-matter engines to take us to the stars.


A detail of the trap used to combine positrons and antiprotons to create antimatter atoms. Photograph courtesy Niels Madsen, ALPHA/Swansea/CERN


(Sean Gallup/Getty Images) Rolf-Dieter Heuer, the director of CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, poses in front of a giant photograph of the CMS detector of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at the 'Weltmaschine' ('World Machine') exhibition on October 14, 2008 in Berlin, Germany

The advantage of using anti-matter is that it is potentially 100 times more powerful than an ordinary H-bomb. Nuclear bombs are only 1% efficient in converting mass to energy (via Einstein's famous equation). But anti-matter, when in contact with matter, yields a 100% efficient conversion of mass to energy. In principle, it is the greatest energy source in the universe.
Anti-matter was first predicted by physicist Paul Dirac, who won the Nobel Prize for it in 1933. It resembles ordinary matter, except it has the opposite charge. So an anti-electron has positive charge, and an anti-proton has negative charge. (Anti-electrons can be produced via radioactive decay. In fact, when I was in high school, I built a detector which photographed tracks of anti-matter. Later, I designed an atom smasher, whose purpose was to produce a beam of anti-matter). Watch a clip from my Big Think Interview speaking about my atom smasher. Anti-hydrogen, produced at CERN, has an anti-electron revolving around an anti-proton.
Anti-atoms at CERN were first produced back in 1995, but they only lived briefly before they annihilated with ordinary atoms. This time, physicists at CERN were able to trap 38 anti-hydrogen atoms (in a combination of magnetic and electric fields) for about 1/10 of a second, a remarkable achievement. It will take many, many decades or longer to produce large quantities of stable anti-matter, however. (In the movie "Angels and Demons," Tom Hanks has to stop terrorists who stole anti-matter from CERN and want to use it blow up the Vatican. Only a gram would be enough to blow up most of Rome, but producing a gram of anti-matter is way beyond our capability. It would bankrupt the U.S. to do so.)



Symbologist Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks) attempting to defuse the anti-matter bomb in the movie Angels and Demons.
So although the recent achievement at CERN was a milestone, it may take many decades to centuries before we can harness the full power of anti-matter. (This time period may be shortened if we find an anti-matter meteorite in outer space.) But Star Trek takes place in the 23rd century—so we still have plenty of time.

Source: http://bigthink.com/ideas/25097

I read the 1st paragraph and smiled and got happy thinking we now have a potential energy source that can take us to the stars. I read the second paragraph and got the crap scared out of me thinking why do we always have to think about better ways to blow shit up?  Reading the rest of the article began to ease my mind in thinking it was way too expensive to produce. Then I figured, they would have known that before they even tried to do it, so why spend the resources to try to do it unless you know you can afford to proceed in producing it? Now we know where all the money went and will continue to go and that`s only on what they decided to tell us about.